Ultrashock Forums - View Single Post

Holaso · 2008-03-25 #4

Mostly I was wondering what Adobe-Macromedia had in mind with respect to functionality when they use "flash" vs. "fl" For example is "flash" more display oriented classes while "fl" is more control related classes? Is it simply an artifact of previous versions? Why were classes written in two different package sets?

	Holaso	2008-03-25 #4
	Mostly I was wondering what Adobe-Macromedia had in mind with respect to functionality when they use "flash" vs. "fl" For example is "flash" more display oriented classes while "fl" is more control related classes? Is it simply an artifact of previous versions? Why were classes written in two different package sets?